Thursday, May 24, 2007

THE AMBIGUITY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE

The blogosphere deconstructs the dichotomy of “public” and “private”. Gossip blogs make public the opinions and daily happenings of the blogger himself. Although academics such as Kris Cohen criticize bloggers as “narcissists” because “they persist in publicizing their boring lives,” an appealing factor of gossip blogs is in fact their publicizing of private thoughts (2006: 165). As Rebecca Blood states “it is captivating to see the biases, interests and judgments of an individual reveal themselves so clearly” for once one “reads any weblog for a few weeks it is impossible not to feel that you know its writer” (2002: xi).


The act of reading a blog is hence akin to the guilty pleasure of reading someone else’s diary (Miller and Shepherd, 2004). Go Fug Yourself, for instance, often uses the “Dear Diary” format while criticizing wardrobe malfunctions of celebrities, creating an illusion of secrecy. In addition, The Independent notes that part of the reason Perez Hilton has succeeded in commanding vast web traffic is because “he says what we are all thinking” (2007). Therefore while the scathing tones of gossip bloggers is in alignment with the traditions of entertainment news, the illusion of interaction with one such blogger is a voyeuristic pleasure limited to the blogosphere. Furthermore, the interactivity of blogs shifts entertainment news from a one-way conversation to a two-way conversation where the reader can make public his own private musings and interact with persons who also have a vested interest in celebrity culture. The blogging platform hence enables gossip blogs to be interactive as well as fuse the public and private. Both aspects are central to the appeal of entertainment culture where audiences regularly seek the private and the public and “pointless conversation” functions as a “powerfully healthy social elixir” (Brooks, 2004: 21a).

BLOGS AND THE ECONOMIES OF ATTENTION

While the interactivity of gossip blogs negates Lanham’s theory of the scarcity of attention, the facility of hyper linking accords gossip blogs an advantage over traditional media. With the overload of entertainment information in all media outlets including the internet, Lanham states “what we lack is the human attention to make sense of it all” (2006: xi). In conjunction, blogs often act as filters of information, linking to the top stories of the day hence for attention scarce readers hyper linking allows the web to be “in effect presurfed for them” (Blood, 2000: 9).



In addition, many gossip blogs offer links to celebrity-specific posts as well as archives of information. An individual interested in the latest tragedies of Britney Spears, hence, would not have to sit through entire broadcast programmes or flick through various magazines but simply click on a section or use the search engine. Entertainment news is in fact a leisure pursuit for most, thus blogging features such as hyper linking, archives and search engines facilitate the consumption of celebrity culture even for those with limited time and interest.

THE LACK OF A DEFINITE INTERNET LAW


The previously explored advantages enjoyed by gossip blogs are largely due to the lack of a definite internet law. Bloggers are seldom charged with libel enabling them to post obscene material and scathing remarks that would not be permitted in traditional media outlets. Perez Hilton’s posting of a video of the accident in which late TLC rapper Left-Eye demised is an exemplary case. Bloggers hence currently benefit from the freedom of an uncensored medium (Flew, 2005: 207). Once legal conduct on the internet is defined, these advantages could be rendered obsolete.

For instance, bloggers are currently able to compete with traditional media outlets by providing images of glamorized Hollywood events and paparazzi shots; both key aspects in the drawing in of audiences and readers. A majority of such visuals are appropriated under the “fair dealings provisions” of the Copyright Act which allows the reproduction of material for non-commercial purposes (Flew, 2005: 211). While it can be argued that blogs sell the opinions of bloggers, the reappropriating of commodities of news and knowledge from traditional media outlets is an undeniably integral aspect of the popularity of blogs. Hyper linking, ease of access and publishing are obsolete advantages when gossip blogs lack the ability to publish leading entertainment headlines.

At the present moment, the platform of blogging has enabled gossip blogs to significantly challenge traditional entertainment media outlets. Perhaps, as blogging emerged from a celebrity-centric, cultural context, its established mechanisms were in alignment with the nihilistic tendencies of and scarcity of attention in society; hence the attractiveness of gossip blogs as an entertainment news medium. It should be noted, however, that these mechanisms currently prevail due the lack of a definitive internet law. With the “fair dealings provision” under review, the outcome will decide whether gossip blogs maintain their current advantages or are a passing trend.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

REFERENCES

Abcarian, S. (2006) ‘Perez Hilton takes their best shots’, Los Angeles Times 17 Dec.

Blood, R. (2000) ‘Weblogs: A History and Perspective’, pp. 7 - 16 in We’ve Got Blog: How Weblogs Are Changing Our Future. Cambridge: Perseus Publising.

Blood, R. (2002) ‘Introduction’, pp. ix and xiii in We’ve Got Blog: How Weblogs Are Changing Our Future. Cambridge: Perseus Publising.

Brooks, C. (2004) ‘What celebrity worship says about us: gossip can serve a purpose,’ USA Today 14 september: 21a.

Bruns, A. and J. Jacobs (eds) (2006) Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Calvert, C. (2000). Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy, and Peering in Modern Culture. Colorado: Westview Press.

Cashmore, E. (2006) Celebrity/Culture. New York: Routledge.

Cohen, K. R. (2006) ‘A welcome for blogs’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 20 (2): 161 – 173.

Devo, H. (2007) ‘Developments in the law’, Harvard Law Review 120: 990 – 1070.

Flew, T. (2005) New Media: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press

Herman, E.S. and N. Chomsky (1999) ‘Manufacturing Consent’ pp. 166 – 179 in H. Tumber (ed.) News: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, S. (2007) ‘Magazine readership plummets’, The Australian 21 April: 16.

Jenkins, H. (2004) ‘The cultural logic of media convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies 7 (1): 33 – 43.

Lanham, R. (2006) The Economics of Attention. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Lovink, G. (2006) ‘Blogging , the nihilistic impulse’, Eurozine: URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-01-02-lovink-en.html

Miller, C. and D. Shepherd (2004) ‘Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog’, Into the Blogosphere: URL (consulted May 2007): http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_a_genre_analysis_of_the_weblog.html

Mulhall, A. (2007) 'One man and his blog', Sunday Times 25 February: 10.

Noble, G. (2003) 'Everyday Work', pp. 87 - 102 in Fran Martin (ed.) Interpreting Everyday Culture. New York: Arnold Publishers

Park, R.E. (1999) ‘News as a form of knowledge: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge’ pp. 11 – 15 in H. Tumber (ed.) News: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pollack, J. (2005) ‘Blogs are not journalism’, St. Louis Journalism Review March: 25 – 26.

Regan, T. (1998) ‘On the web, speed instead of accuracy’, Neiman Reports 52 (1): 81.

Street, J. (2001) Mass Media, Politics and Democracy. New York: Palgrave.

The Independent (2007) ‘The Star-Spangled Blogger’, The Independent Online 31 March, < http://news.independent.co.uk>

Tiffen, R. (1994) ‘The Media and Democracy: Reclaiming an Intellectual Agenda’ pp. 53 – 67 in J. Schultz (ed.) Not Just Another Business: Journalists, Citizens and the Media. Leichardt: Pluto.

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Monday, May 7, 2007

THE YES MEN


Is this Art or Activism?

Friday, May 4, 2007

IT'S ESSAY TIME AGAIN

For anyone doing their essay on the blogging question regarding Lovink, this is a helpful link. It's a speed interview for Il Manifesto and covers some key points.